I do not know why I always disagree when some people think Tottenham (AVB) using or have used or will use a 4-3-3 formation. Since I am not from an English-speaking country, and also with a mobile phone, it's hard for me to express what I wanted to express. About, a 4-2-3-1 formation to be confused with the 4-3-3, by some people. AVB failed with a 4-3-3 formation at Chelsea, then Di Matteo using a 4-2-3-1 formation and won the Champions League. A 4-3-3 and 4-2-3-1, I think it's two different formations and are not easy to switch between them especially in a game, or in the ongoing season. Tottenham have to start all over again to switch to a 4-3-3 formation. With limited players that matter, it's hard to use that formation. It takes more resources and quality players more than ever. But that's still not enough. I think that is why Chelsea have difficulties to keep using 4-3-3. Mourinho came to the Premier League in a different situation, the time is right, also a team like Manchester United are still using pure and rigid 4-4-2 at that time. The fact is that even for a (money)club in the Premier League, it is still difficult to switch from (4-4-2/4-4-1-1) to 4-3-3. Last season Arsenal played a 4-2-3-1, some people may not agree that it was 4-3-3 but it was not. In this case Tottenham themselves already have enough problems in switching to a more adaptive 4-2-3-1 rather than 4-3-3. But for the game which is always ridiculous every time against Manchester United on Saturday, a Way better than a No Way, for a 4-3-3 formation. Why not?