Is It Time For Spurs To Look Towards A Future Without Aaron Lennon?
Over the last three years, Tottenham Hotspur have developed a reputation for fast-paced, attacking football. That always begins on the wings, where Gareth Bale and Aaron Lennon present opposing defenses a nightmare match-up as they try to cope with the Welshman and Englishman's blistering speed. As brilliant as Luka Modric, Rafael van der Vaart and several others have been, the team's identity comes from those wingers.
As long as Bale is at White Hart Lane, he is going to be linked to moves to bigger clubs, but Tottenham have the leverage there. They can keep him as long as they can contract him, which shouldn't be a massive problem. As far as Bale goes, it's tough to imagine him not being on the left wing for Spurs in the next few years, but on the right wing, things are a little more murky.
Lennon completes the pacey width attack of Spurs, but only when he is on the pitch, which isn't a given anymore. He has a history of small little pulls and niggles that keep him out a week or two here and a week or two there and when he is out, Spurs are forced to complete change the way they play. Either another central midfielder comes into the team and Spurs go into a Christmas tree formation, a player without pace who is more comfortable in the center goes wide and tucks in or everyone just runs around a bit. Sometimes it is effective and other times it is not, but Lennon's absence certainly throw the team into a state of flux .
One way to counter Lennon's increasing absence is to buy a lesser, but still good player who fits the Lennon mold. FInding someone with quite as much pace as Lennon would be near impossible, but finding another right winger with pace that would be able to slide into Lennon's spot and play the same way to keep Spurs from having to make themselves over when Lennon is absent? That's possible.
There is also the more radical way forward. With Lennon's injury problems a greater concern, maybe it is time to move on without him. Instead of dealing with the drama of "will he play, won't he play" so often, maybe it is time to find another winger. It may not be the incredibly pacey winger in the mold of Lennon, but he could give Spurs a new and maybe not inferior identity and approach.
Spurs already looked towards either cover or a replacement for Lennon this January when they chases Milos Krasic so the topic is on the minds of those at the club, but there are other possibilities. Didier Ya Konan, Andre Ayew, Pablo Hernandez could all slide in and do a fabulous job...or Spurs could continue their odd infatuation with Junior Hoilett and sign him on a free transfer.
Will this summer be the time they make a clean break and move forward without their speedster winger pairing? A Lennon-less future is certainly on their minds, at least to some degree.
39 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Cannot disagree more
He’s still young enough that he can evolve into one of the best wingers in the Premiership. Now is certainly not the time to cash in.
by Edward_Francis on Feb 8, 2012 12:43 PM GMT up reply actions
wheeeeee-ooooooooooh
Why is the Jermaine Jenas signal in my head BLARING? ;)
SB Nation's World Soccer Editor, manager of Cartilage Free Captain, contributor to Acme Packing Company.
by Kevin McCauley on Feb 8, 2012 12:54 PM GMT up reply actions
He's going to be fucking 25!
He is what he is dude.
Author and Contributor at Cartilage Free Captain
by Nick Petrilli on Feb 8, 2012 12:58 PM GMT up reply actions
In the words of Rick James, via Dave Chappelle
I wish I had two more thumbs, so I could give this four thumbs down!!!
Do not sell Lennon. Rather just make him a squad player if you bring in another right winger.
//Lennon is my favorite Spurs, so maybe I have blind bias.
Tottenham Hotspurs, Penn State, and Winthrop are the only things that made me cry in my adult life.
by Tottenham Makes Me Cry on Feb 8, 2012 12:12 PM GMT reply actions
Lennon won't be a squad player
He’ll want first team football.
Author and Contributor at Cartilage Free Captain
by Nick Petrilli on Feb 8, 2012 12:19 PM GMT up reply actions
Which he should get at Spurs
He is bound to pick up little knocks b/c of the style he plays and how teams defend him. Bale is bound to get the same problems too. As both develop a plan b and c in attacking style, the injuries, theoretically, should be less and less.
Tottenham Hotspurs, Penn State, and Winthrop are the only things that made me cry in my adult life.
by Tottenham Makes Me Cry on Feb 8, 2012 12:47 PM GMT up reply actions
The same could be said about all players
You could say all players could be replaced because they get injured here and there. VDV would be gone in a flash.
by Scott Parker's Hairline on Feb 8, 2012 12:47 PM GMT via mobile reply actions 1 recs
I'm not sure that's a good comparison
I think we can all agree that VDV’s moments of brilliance are both more frequent and more brilliant than Aaron Lennon’s.
SB Nation's World Soccer Editor, manager of Cartilage Free Captain, contributor to Acme Packing Company.
by Kevin McCauley on Feb 8, 2012 12:55 PM GMT up reply actions
It's pro vs cons
And right now the cons outweigh the pros for Aaron Lennon. My big thing? We could get a really fat fucking price for Lennon in the summer. And it’d be totally worth it too.
Author and Contributor at Cartilage Free Captain
by Nick Petrilli on Feb 8, 2012 12:59 PM GMT up reply actions
Can we?
Who’s shelling out?
SB Nation's World Soccer Editor, manager of Cartilage Free Captain, contributor to Acme Packing Company.
by Kevin McCauley on Feb 8, 2012 1:00 PM GMT up reply actions
QPR seem like a good candidate
Sunderland too, and the Liverpool rumors had to have had SOME basis. The way I see it, you shop a 25 year old English international around and someone will bite, and overpay for between 10-15 million. Maybe more if we’re lucky.
Author and Contributor at Cartilage Free Captain
by Nick Petrilli on Feb 8, 2012 1:03 PM GMT up reply actions
I don't think we get more than 10mm pounds.
Which is not enough. I would let him go for twice that, minimum
In O'Ventbrel We Trust
ALL GLORY TO THFC
VICK-VICK-VICKADELPHIA
I believe in MAGIC
Sold my Soul to the Devils
I think you could get more than 10 for him...
He’s English right? QPR or Liverpool or someone like that might be interested in buying him.
Official troll of WAGNH and CFC
by Sabrina Dessipe on Feb 8, 2012 1:05 PM GMT up reply actions
Cons?
I think he has more pros the cons, I would like to hear your cons with Lennon.
by Scott Parker's Hairline on Feb 8, 2012 1:20 PM GMT via mobile up reply actions
Let's see
Cons:
Mediocre crossing
Poor last move
Peak value reached or near reached
Non existent for set pieces
Poor defense
Doesn’t have a final ball
Pros:
Fast
Great dribbler
Good passer
Good first touch
High work rate
Author and Contributor at Cartilage Free Captain
by Nick Petrilli on Feb 8, 2012 1:31 PM GMT up reply actions
Liverpool?
But I wouldn’t sell. Do spurs need cover on the right wing, specifically someone who is quick? Of course. But I think Lennon is more important to Spurs than a lot of people give him credit for, if only for stopping teams doing what Liverpool did to us on Monday night. With Lennon, VDV and Bale on the pitch it makes it a lot harder for teams to double or triple up on any of them.
I don’t think we could replace him with a better fit for the way Spurs play. He’s an enabler, allowing VDV and Bale more time and space to play their game. Opposition can’t ignore him so he gives them another decision to make.
I have no doubts we could find a player like that on the transfer market
Someone with better crosses preferably.
Author and Contributor at Cartilage Free Captain
by Nick Petrilli on Feb 8, 2012 1:07 PM GMT up reply actions
So is that what you would view as the most important attribute of a winger, delivery?
And how do you juggle that with pace? For example, Krasic is probably a better footballer than Lennon but you sacrifice some pace in the trade. In the position Lennon plays how much are you willing to trade?
(I’m not being pedantic here, I’m genuinely interested on your take).
I suppose what I’m really interested in is whether you would want a right midfielder or winger and which would suit Spurs more. I’m of the opinion that Spurs need to play with two pacey wingers, can you give a couple of examples of players with Lennon’s pace but with better delivery (and decision making) – my limited football knowledge is not coming up with much.
What I don't get
is that he’s been a professional footballer for many, many years at this point. He has always had pace and dribbling ability. He has gradually evolved a better football brain. However, his crossing is STILL atrocious. Why hasn’t he spent an offseason just practicing crossing 200,000 times? Like, seriously. You are rich as hell, playing a game you love, and on the verge of becoming one of the best wingers in the league. But you don’t go address your most glaring weakness? I simply do not understand how it has not improved. He has all the other tools, just needs better delivery and decision-making at the last moment. What are the coaches having him work on?
by LanceAnderson on Feb 8, 2012 2:02 PM GMT up reply actions
I dunno about this.
This season Spurs really haven’t played much with two pacey wingers, because with Bale drifting inside as much as he does, he’s not really playing a winger position. He’s an inside forward. Or maybe a “wide trequartista.” Or, if I may coin a word, a “FRAAB.” (Fucking Run Around A Bit)
It seems to me that Spurs’ tactics are evolving to the point where we don’t really use midfield width much at this point, or if we do the width comes from BAE and Walker marauding up from the fullback position. And does Lennon fit into this new reality?
Moderator and Poet Laureate at Cartilage Free Captain
General Secretary of the CFC Commentariat Committee
Tottenham Hotspur & Indiana Hoosiers
Follow @dustingm
I actually think that our best team right now does not include Lennon, for two reasons
1. Bale is good as the LCAM in the FRAAB 4-3-3, playing a similar position to Rafael Van der Vaart
2. This formation not only allows us to play both Bale and Rafa in their “best” positions, but allows us to get all of Modric, Parker and Sandro on the pitch.
SB Nation's World Soccer Editor, manager of Cartilage Free Captain, contributor to Acme Packing Company.
by Kevin McCauley on Feb 8, 2012 2:54 PM GMT up reply actions
Yes, yes yes
This is what I have been advocating the entire season. Of our attacking players (Modric, VdV, Adebayor and Bale) Lennon brings the least to the table. In a perfect world we drop lennon to role with Sand and Parker in midfield IMO.
by LanceAnderson on Feb 8, 2012 2:56 PM GMT up reply actions
To his credit, though,
Lennon has shown the ability to do fairly well drifting inside, though he’s best hugging the touchline. In that sense he could probably sub in for VDV, though he brings a different skillset to the formation.
“FRAAB 4-3-3.” Ha! I like that.
Moderator and Poet Laureate at Cartilage Free Captain
General Secretary of the CFC Commentariat Committee
Tottenham Hotspur & Indiana Hoosiers
Follow @dustingm
cool story bro
SB Nation's World Soccer Editor, manager of Cartilage Free Captain, contributor to Acme Packing Company.
by Kevin McCauley on Feb 8, 2012 1:56 PM GMT up reply actions
Goals
I personally feel like Aaron Lennon has added an extra dimension to his game this season that we haven’t had enough of a chance to get a feel for. With the inverted wingers/double stuffed wingers that we were seeing in the fall, and with Adebayor’s innerchange and short passing with the wingers, Lennon had a couple of really great goals on the left side.
Obviously, Bale has added goals to his game and become much more multi-dimensional player and he is basically impossible to mark out of a game these days with his movement in and out and his threat crossing or shooting. It’s not the same at all with Lennon, who is certainly still a somewhat one-dimensional player, but I do feel like Lennon has done this to a lesser extent. I think there may come a time to sell him in the next year or so, but I’d like to see a little bit more of him on the field before deciding because I see some potential for development there with his movement to the left side and his ability to pass and move quickly closer to the goal.
Crossing is still bleh, of course.
"I’m not the type of player who consistently runs after opponents." -Rafa
"I didn't see the twit, the tweet, because I can't work a tweeter." -'Arry
by Kevin Stewart Rose on Feb 8, 2012 2:25 PM GMT reply actions
I Love Aaron Lennon
Interesting stats on chances created per minute. Since 2007, Lennon ranks 15th in the country, creating a scoring opportunity roughly every 45 minutes. (Top is Cesc at 33 minutes). He’s the highest ranked English player on the list.
I don’t think he’s as one dimensional as suggested. He’s lately demonstrated the ability to pop up on the left and link really really well with Bale, and come inside and shoot. He’s had trouble in the past being marked out of games, but since Bale’s come into the side that really hasn’t been as much of a problem. Usually the defense’s attention is focused on Bale and our left wing leaving Lennon in space to punish the other team. His defensive ability and workrate is outstanding for a winger, and Nick, I will argue with you about this forever if need be.
Yes, his decision-making can be poor at times, and sometimes his delivery isn’t the greatest. But compared to the service from Kyle Walker on the right that we’ve seen lately, Lennon is basically David Beckham. Also, we had a guy with great delivery recently. His name was David Bentley. That was not a good time.
I don’t know how important crossing is or should be to our style of play. I would much rather us play clever diagonals and incisive balls into the box than lumping balls at Adebayor’s head. Which Lennon is capable of doing.
I’m not saying he can’t be upgraded on, but there’s no reason to send him to the glue factory quite yet. And if Harry ever learns squad rotation, he can be a regular part of the first team with winger x and Bale, even if he doesn’t play every game.
tl;dnr
Author at FourFiveTwo
Follow @BenTheLorber
by Lennon's Eyebrow on Feb 8, 2012 2:41 PM GMT reply actions 2 recs
Mother effing this!!!!^^^^^^
I get it. It’s a business. But come on, every position can be “upgraded” doesn’t it mean it has to be.
Case in point, Mr. “my wife could have scored that” Bent. He was an upgrade, brought in because he’s better than JD.
Also, we play a lot better when we keep the ball on the floor, which Lennon has steadily improved at getting assist to Bale for. The interchangeable futol that Bale-Lennon- Walker- BAE have done is a part of what make Spurs so hard to defend against on the counter.
Tottenham Hotspurs, Penn State, and Winthrop are the only things that made me cry in my adult life.
by Tottenham Makes Me Cry on Feb 8, 2012 2:49 PM GMT up reply actions
I agree with most all of this
I don’t think Lennon gets the credit he deserves tracking back on defense. Is he amazing at defending? No, but I think he does a better job getting back than Bale.
I also believe squad rotation is something Harry needs to learn. If we bring in a guy better than Lennon (Hazard would be nice), it shouldn’t mean he goes from starting to not playing. We complain about his injuries, but if he was rotated properly less injuries would occur. Lennon still plays a huge role for Spurs and has a future here.
by NYCisTwinsTerritory on Feb 8, 2012 2:51 PM GMT up reply actions
This is a really good comment
And probably should have been/could still be a fanpost with the points expanded upon
SB Nation's World Soccer Editor, manager of Cartilage Free Captain, contributor to Acme Packing Company.
by Kevin McCauley on Feb 8, 2012 2:55 PM GMT up reply actions
I think the Lennon question directly relates to the striker question, which is implied in what you're saying here.
This comment really helps solidify some of my inclinations on Lennon, whom I like but wish was more involved. It seems to me that even our best crossers of the ball (Bale & BAE, probably) put in low, speedy shit that folks can run onto. We did the heading thing with 3MP when he was here, & it worked to some effect. As it turns out, though, I agree with that we’re a better side with the ball on the ground. & as you’re arguing here, Lennon’s better that way, too.
I think this affects the question of a potential striker purchase in the summer. Heading ability, in this formulation, need not be a primary strength (though it should still be an available tool). I don’t know how this shapes our list of potential targets, & assuming we keep hold of Lennon (which I’m more than happy to do) & buy cover that can do similar work, the question I’d like answered here is: Who do we need up top to best work to our mazy, on-the-ground style of play?
by The Sleeper's Sleep on Feb 8, 2012 5:28 PM GMT up reply actions
This is a great, great argument
To the point where I don’t know where I stand.
"and if I kill one supporter, sorry"
-Benoit Assou-Ekotto
If the choice is
upgrading Lennon and extending Saha or upgrading at striker and bringing in a pacey back-up at RM. I would rather spend my money for the person up front.
by NYCisTwinsTerritory on Feb 8, 2012 2:53 PM GMT reply actions
Here's how I see things:
There are really only three field positions Spurs can upgrade this summer. Center back, right midfield and striker. Outside of a handful of players IN THE WORLD (and more money/salary than we can afford), every other position cannot be improved upon. So we look at those three positions.
Spurs are already in the market for strikers. Hopefully that means someone at least up to Adebayor’s class (or Adebayor himself), but finding a player that is a significant upgrade over Adebayor will be difficult. Adebayor’s finishing has left us wanting this season, but his creativity, off-the-ball movement and work rate have been excellent. Adebayor isn’t perfect, but I think it’ll take someone bordering on World Class to significantly improve that position. Can Spurs sign that player? Man I hope so.
Center backs. Looking at the stats, Spurs are 5th in the league for average goals conceded:
Manchester City – 0.79
Liverpool – 0.88
Manchester United – 1.00
Sunderland – 1.00
Tottenham Hotspur – 1.04
Now, take into account that we allowed 8 goals in our first two games with an unsettled Luka, no Scott Parker (or any holding mids for that matter), and no Adebayor holding up play. If we take those two games out of the equation, Spurs allowed 17 goals in 22 games, for an average of 0.77 goals per game. That’s a goals allowed average BETTER THAN MANCHESTER CITY. Can Spurs get better in defense? Marginally. I might be in the minority, but I think Kaboul, Dawson and Caulker make excellent first choice center backs for next season. Any game King gets in is gravy. Spurs just need cover.
So, right midfield. Personally, I like Aaron Lennon. I think he’s an exciting albeit frustrating winger and his pace makes defenses have to adjust. The thing is, pacey right wingers seem to be a dime a dozen. We even have a Lennon clone in Andros Townsend waiting in the wings. If Spurs can get anything over £15m for Lennon they’d be crazy not to take it. And as long as Bale and VDV are in the side, I don’t see Spurs going back to a traditional 4-4-2 with touchline-hugging wingers sending in crosses. I think what serves Spurs better is a right winger with a better eye for goal and creativity, like a Juan Mata or Arjen Robben (or even Clint Dempsey for that matter). I’d like to see Spurs try to bring in Loic Remy or Lukas Podolski. Spurs can be getting better production out of that position, and having Aaron Lennon there, while serviceable, is sorta like having a first baseman that hits for average.

by 

























