Steve McClaren's Last Days -or- A Sign Of Things To Come?
The FA says they have multiple candidates and they haven't made a decision on their new manager. Harry Redknapp says that no one has called him. A lot of this is probably true, and some of it probably isn't. Eventually, Harry Redknapp will probably be named the England manager, and no one will be surprised. The fans, the media, and the players want someone English. The FA wants someone English. Mark Hughes and Roy Hodgson haven't accomplished much lately.
So, like they did with Steve McClaren, The FA will settle for the best English manager around. And that's what this is -- settling for Harry Redknapp. This is not to say that The FA is incompetent or that Harry Redknapp's a bad manager. He just hasn't achieved what a manager should have achieved if he's getting hired by a country whose aspiration is to win the World Cup.
Toss aside all of your personal feelings on these issues for a second. It doesn't really matter if England's goals are unreachable, if The FA actually is incompetent or whether or not Harry is a good manager. If a national team's goal is to win a World Cup in the short term, they are settling if they hire a manager who has never won his domestic league, Champions League, the World Cup or an international continental championship.
In 2006, all of those criteria applied to England and Steve McClaren.
There are a couple of differences between Harry Redknapp and Steve McClaren. Harry Redknapp has won the FA Cup, McClaren had won only the League Cup when he was hired. McClaren's Middlesborough side finished sixth in his best year, while Redknapp has a fourth place finish under his belt and is about to have another finish of fourth or higher. Harry is probably The FA's first choice, while Luiz Felipe Scolari was their first choice in 2006.
Other than that, they're eerily similar, and not just because they're both English. Both of them have won very little. Neither of them have managed the best of the best. Both have -- or had shortly before taking the England job -- loose and old-school management styles. Because Brian Clough was a thing, this was (and is) seen as a positive.
On May 4, 2006, McClaren was introduced as the new England boss. This came a day after his team's second to last Premier League game and six days before the UEFA Cup final. Boro were not in a European or relegation race, so he played his kids on the final day of the Premier League season. Going into the UEFA Cup final, there was speculation about whether or not his team would be focused. After the game, there were questions about much more than that.
I wasn't at the ground on that day and I certainly wasn't in the locker room, so I can't tell you how motivated the Boro players were, but they got smoked. Completely outplayed, whistle to whistle. I remember watching that game, 17-year-old me laughing my ass off that this team was managed by the next manager of England.
Sevilla's fullbacks -- especially Daniel Alves -- were completely untested by Boro's wingers and were allowed to run the game. Fullbacks, allowed to run the game! Luis Fabiano's opening goal was the third or fourth chance that should have been scored, and it was a miracle that Boro were only down one at halftime. Eventually, McClaren took off a midfielder and threw on Yakubu. His leading scorer. Who did not start the game. Inserted for a midfielder, when his team was getting dominated in possession.
The result was predictable, as Sevilla dominated possession further. It took until the 78th minute for them to find their second goal. They found two more after that and won 4-0. Incredibly, the score did not tell the story. Boro could have lost by eight. They were terrible. McClaren's tactics and a lack of focus were both almost certainly to blame.
This is what happened to Middlesborough when their manager was poached with just two games remaining in the season. McClaren and his team were completely unfocused for arguably the biggest match in the club's history, and they failed miserably.
If Harry Redknapp becomes England's manager, he will not be named manager with two games remaining. He will be named manager with at least a month remaining, if not two. In 2006, England had Sven-Goran Eriksson to lead them through the World Cup. England currently has Stuart Pearce at the helm, and it would be ridiculous to let him keep the reigns until June.
It's possible that Harry decides that the media pressure of the England job isn't for him. It's possible that Daniel Levy, in true Daniel Levy fashion, tells them to go f--- themselves. It's possible that The FA realizes that hiring Redknapp is lunacy. But more likely than not, Harry Redknapp will be named the England manger with a few games remaining. Hopefully, Harry and The FA are nice enough to wait until after the Chelsea match on March 25.
Let's hope that Luka Modric, Gareth Bale and co. are simply too good for us to suffer the McClaren collapse.
11 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I just want this whole thing resolved sooner rather than later.
The club muddled through when Harry was on trial, but I don’t think another week or two of limbo helps anyone. If it’s going to happen, let it happen soon; if not, let Harry get back to work securing Spurs’ CL spot.
by The Sleeper's Sleep on Feb 10, 2012 8:39 PM GMT reply actions
A little perspective
That tale about Middlesbrough does tend to paper over the fact that McLaren led the club to its best performances ever in terms of actually winning one trophy and reaching the final of a very competitive UEFA cup. On paper they were never going to be good in a matchup with that Sevilla side.
And if we are really lucky, Harry will weigh up the chances of actually winning anything with England against the inevitable media witchhunt he will be subject to in 2 years or so when the team somehow fails to win every game 5-0 and goes out of another World Cup at the quarter final stage. He might well consider that sticking with Spurs and actually having a hope in hell of winning trophies is the better option.
I doubt it.
Harry’s a proud Englishman. And as a proud Englishman, if your country – your crazy-ass, codependent, self-indulgent, Tiger Mom country – comes calling, you will still likely answer.
Moderator and Poet Laureate at Cartilage Free Captain
General Secretary of the CFC Commentariat Committee
Tottenham Hotspur & Indiana Hoosiers
Follow @dustingm
A couple of points here . . .
1) Mark Hughes is Welsh
2) Even though Middlesbrough got to the final of the UEFA Cup, they were at that point, massively over-achieving considering the players they had.
3) McClaren is an ok manager. He may think he’s great but a Dutch Championship does not make you a top manager. His disastrous 2008 qualifying campaign and his terrible Dutch accent, suggests that he is more of a pompous, arrogant wannabe, than a credible football manager.
4) Tottenham aren’t Middlesborough.
Boro weren’t a club any top manager wanted to manage. Tottenham (without being too arrogant) are.
He may not be a great manager
But I feel I should defend McClaren’s coaching credentials here. United effectively won the treble through his tehcniques.
by Edward_Francis on Feb 11, 2012 2:21 PM GMT up reply actions
'Arry 'as an 'istory
And it’s not all great. He destroyed Southampton and Portsmouth before he came to us.
On the other hand, maybe a loose, hands-off, fuckin’ run around a bit style is what England’s odd mix of overentitled crybabies and talented but directionless youngsters need. I dunno.
I do know that if I was the manager of any team in England I’d be telling my promising young players, “fuck off, don’t play for England, tell them no. There’s no glory there, no hope, no chance to advance either your skills or your reputation. Only ruin them. Go to another club if you want but don’t play for England; it’s poison. I mean, JUST LOOK AT THEM.”
I find it weird
That wanting to play or manage your country can be viewed negatively…
An interesting article you have here...
Cards on the table: I’m English, I’m a Chelsea fan and I’m not trying to troll you.
What I don’t particularly understand is why, given Redknapp’s trophy cabinet, he’s pretty much the only name being considered for the England job. If they’re really sure they want an Englishman as manager, I’d be having a long, hard look at Tony Pulis – he’s done pretty damn well with a pretty crap squad and plays a style of football that would be well suited to the England team.
And if they were prepared to widen the scope of their targets slightly, David Moyes and Martin O’Neill would also be pretty good options.
I don’t have anything against Redknapp, per se, but I don’t see how he’s pretty much the unanimous choice for this job – England need a manager that’s able to come up with a tactical master-plan to beat Spain/Germany/Netherlands/Italy etc with inferior players and I don’t see ’Arry being that guy…

by 
























